From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Voi3J-0006D1-Dg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:09:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Voi3E-0006YM-Cx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:09:49 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:34053) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Voi3E-0006YI-70 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:09:44 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id v10so25732759pde.27 for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:09:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <52A1036B.9030002@twiddle.net> References: <1386280289-27636-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <1386280289-27636-6-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <52A1036B.9030002@twiddle.net> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 23:09:23 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/13] target-arm: A64: add support for 2-src data processing and DIV List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: Patch Tracking , Michael Matz , QEMU Developers , Claudio Fontana , Dirk Mueller , Will Newton , Laurent Desnogues , =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , Christoffer Dall On 5 December 2013 22:51, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 12/06/2013 10:51 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> + switch (opcode) { >> + case 2: /* UDIV */ >> + handle_div(s, FALSE, sf, rm, rn, rd); >> + break; >> + case 3: /* SDIV */ >> + handle_div(s, TRUE, sf, rm, rn, rd); >> + break; > > What are these all-caps TRUE/FALSE? stdbool.h uses lower-case. Good question, I wonder what system header is managing to define those for us? (there are some other bits of the source tree which use them too I see). > Otherwise, > > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson By the way, for these "otherwise reviewed-by" patches, would you prefer me to make the obvious trivial fix and include your R-b tag on the fixed version in the next respin, or to make the fix and leave the tag off so you can recheck it? thanks -- PMM