From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54745)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1S7CbX-0006Vh-4m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:16:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1S7CbS-0001KW-AZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:16:30 -0400
Received: from mail-iy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173]:56941)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1S7CbS-0001KE-65
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:16:26 -0400
Received: by iafj26 with SMTP id j26so8151753iaf.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F5E6572.5060604@codemonkey.ws>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1203121648210.923@kaball-desktop>
	<4F5E58BE.6040808@weilnetz.de>
	<CAFEAcA-m+WzTvFn1QQTsepu1Er=6upFx7_P7gADeQmOkX_ahFg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F5E5CA4.3040407@codemonkey.ws>
	<CAFEAcA_WnOfAKMMF6_Nq5vXpvBUbnEtL9AmstCK8apvPKtqNTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F5E6572.5060604@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:16:23 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA8H+DouojyLGqL-BFZ800XOw2BuSS_dWhPQZmkuLoKe+A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] We need more reviewers/maintainers!!
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>

On 12 March 2012 21:06, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> In all fairness, the last build breakage I see was specific to win32, was
> reported on Mar 1st, and a patch was committed on Mar 3rd.

Commit 02021812452 (patch reported March 2nd, applied March 9th)
is more recent than that.

I think a couple of days is fine, a week (with a pile of other
stuff committed beforehand) is less than ideal.

-- PMM