From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41685) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfUyc-00075q-P0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:50:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfUyX-0005hc-Od for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:50:38 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]:39323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfUyX-0005hR-Hv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:50:33 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ec20so3163301lab.4 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 05:50:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <519E0D71.8090107@suse.de> References: <5141F36E.10004@huawei.com> <519DCEC8.8060000@huawei.com> <519E0D71.8090107@suse.de> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:50:11 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] ARM aarch64 TCG target VERSION 2 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Claudio Fontana , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson On 23 May 2013 13:37, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > If Big Endian targets are not yet supported, should this rather be an > RFC? Or is that just about some unimplemented opcodes? I'm happy for us to wait until an actual big-endian system running Linux appears before we worry about it. #error if anybody tries it is perfectly fine. (I would be surprised if we got it right for the 32 bit bigendian hosts, for that matter: there simply aren't really any systems out there running big-endian Linux ARM which you could test it on.) thanks -- PMM