From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gD5QA-0005eJ-60 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 06:20:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gD5Q9-0000Vc-5u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 06:20:49 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x342.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::342]:37284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gD5Q8-0000Ui-Ms for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 06:20:49 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-x342.google.com with SMTP id o14so29239477oth.4 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 03:20:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20181010203735.27918-1-aclindsa@gmail.com> <20181010203735.27918-13-aclindsa@gmail.com> <0fdcad4a-c8b5-3309-d2ce-f9be901ec52a@linaro.org> <20181017192013.GA25905@quinoa.localdomain> <31f327f4-42ee-55fc-596d-97d935803867@linaro.org> <20181017202505.GC25905@quinoa.localdomain> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 11:20:27 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 12/14] target/arm: PMU: Set PMCR.N to 4 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: Aaron Lindsay , Aaron Lindsay , "qemu-arm@nongnu.org" , Alistair Francis , Wei Huang , Peter Crosthwaite , Michael Spradling , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Digant Desai On 17 October 2018 at 22:14, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 10/17/18 1:25 PM, Aaron Lindsay wrote: >> I suppose pmcrn (the local variable) should've been set to 0 before this >> patch and updated here to be 4. > > That's plausible. > >> Anyway, by splitting these patches apart, my intention was to separate >> the plumbing work from turning on the water. If you believe it is better >> to do both in the same patch, I'll make that change for v7. > > Fair. I'll let Peter weigh in for final decision. No strong opinion -- rth has reviewed this set, not me. thanks -- PMM