From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34750) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVM9m-0005hF-J4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 08:19:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVM9g-0002Hj-FC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 08:19:42 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.213.173]:39549) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SVM9g-0002Hb-BX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 08:19:36 -0400 Received: by yenm4 with SMTP id m4so3498764yen.4 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 05:19:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4FB63CDC.8040807@suse.de> References: <1337016729-12285-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <4FB63CDC.8040807@suse.de> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 13:19:34 +0100 Message-ID: From: Peter Maydell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next 00/22] ARM: QOM cpu_reset() followups List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= Cc: Mitsyanko Igor , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 18 May 2012 13:13, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > Patch 1 is irrelevant to my refactorings so I'd ask you, Peter, to queue > it in case some other ARM patch for 1.1 comes along. I would not at this point put patch 1 in for 1.1 even if there was some other target-arm patch that caused me to have to do a pullreq for 1.1 -- it's not a necessary change (even if it's an obviously safe one) and we're only two weeks from release. -- PMM