From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48306) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fL3Me-0005zE-Ps for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 05:13:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fL3Md-00041g-P8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 05:13:52 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::241]:41735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fL3Md-00041K-Ji for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 05:13:51 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x241.google.com with SMTP id 11-v6so15541962ois.8 for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 02:13:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5AC97568.2040502@huawei.com> References: <1521530809-11780-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> <1521530809-11780-3-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> <5AB0F254.3050503@huawei.com> <5AB21130.2020309@huawei.com> <5AC97568.2040502@huawei.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 10:13:30 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 2/2] arm_gicv3_kvm: kvm_dist_get/put: skip the registers banked by GICR List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Shannon Zhao Cc: qemu-arm , QEMU Developers , Eric Auger , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Juan Quintela , Shannon Zhao On 8 April 2018 at 02:50, Shannon Zhao wrote: > On 2018/4/6 17:36, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On reflection, I think I'd aim for 2.13 for this, since: >> * it's not a regression >> * it doesn't actually affect any of our boards, because >> none of them define enough interrupt lines that they >> would actually be using the top 32 that we fail to migrate >> * getting the migration compat right is a bit tricky and >> will benefit from having the time for careful review and testing >> >> Let me know if I'm wrong with any of those assumptions. > > Yes, it's no need to merge this for 2.12. I'll respin this patch later. Looking at another GIC related patch this morning reminded me about this one. Shannon, are you planning to respin this now we've reopened for 2.13 development? thanks -- PMM