From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLAJ8-0001jj-FE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 12:38:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLAJ7-0002i5-NN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 12:38:42 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::243]:45893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLAJ7-0002hl-JN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 12:38:41 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x243.google.com with SMTP id b130-v6so16797624oif.12 for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 09:38:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 17:38:20 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 proposed release schedule List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Warner Losh Cc: QEMU Developers , Michael Roth On 22 May 2018 at 17:34, Warner Losh wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Peter Maydell > wrote: >> The usual recommendation is to submit early and often. > > > Should I do a RFC or preview submission then of the first dozen patches > maybe as I work out integrating back the bug/compile fixes into the early > series? I'd love to get feedback, but don't want to waste people's time on > something that I've not compile tested every change on (just the final > results, which stands today at ~125 changes, but last week was at 200). I would suggest a preview submission, yes, though if it did at least compile that would be nice... -- PMM