From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46881)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1UbW6r-0005TG-Of
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2013 09:14:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1UbW6q-0004aF-QK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2013 09:14:41 -0400
Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]:35436)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1UbW6q-0004Zt-Jz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 May 2013 09:14:40 -0400
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id fq12so4734lab.20
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 12 May 2013 06:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <518F913B.8040703@tribudubois.net>
References: <cover.1368001258.git.jcd@tribudubois.net>
	<518F913B.8040703@tribudubois.net>
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 14:14:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA8V2dB4b=gCTK0AHveAOSFep9TsOSLLoZ9fzimfY+pWEA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] Add i.MX25 support through the 3DS
	evaluation board
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jean-Christophe DUBOIS <jcd@tribudubois.net>
Cc: peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com, peter.chubb@nicta.com.au, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, afaerber@suse.de

On 12 May 2013 13:55, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS <jcd@tribudubois.net> wrote:
> In your opinion, is this patch set good enough in its actual state for
> inclusion?
>
> Are you expecting anything else from me (beside maybe adding more i.MX
> devices in the future)?

I haven't looked at this series yet because we're in codefreeze.

thanks
-- PMM