From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52313) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csvO2-0005Cj-QJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:58:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csvO2-0001CA-3Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:58:30 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]:38191) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csvO1-0001BF-SL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:58:30 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id t189so5373357wmt.1 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:58:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:58:08 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-devel mailing list vs DMARC and microsoft.com's p=reject policy List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andrew Baumann Cc: QEMU Developers , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Stefan Hajnoczi On 28 March 2017 at 18:53, Andrew Baumann wrote: >> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.maydell@linaro.org] >> (1) I could set dmarc_moderation_action=Reject >> * this means nobody can subscribe if they've set their dmarc policy >> to reject (the "if you don't believe in mailing lists we don't >> believe in you" policy). > > Clarification: if I've understood correctly, this means nobody can *post*, > right? The problem arises when I post to the list, not when I subscribed > (and qemu-devel doesn't require subscription to post). Yes, you're right. It wouldn't inconvenience mere lurkers at these domains. thanks -- PMM