From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Shashi Mallela" <shashi.mallela@linaro.org>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [for-6.2] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Update cached state after acknowledging LPI
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:46:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA8XMtAHKY=saAajLc2b03_PHGi+G=iioEpeetuS3Hh5yg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211123171031.975367-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 17:10, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> In gicv3_redist_lpi_pending() we update cs->hpplpi to indicate the
> new highest priority pending LPI after changing the requested LPI
> pending bit. However the overall highest priority pending interrupt
> information won't be updated unless we call gicv3_redist_update().
> We do that from the callsite in gicv3-redist_process_lpi(), but not
> from the callsite in icc_activate_irq(). The effect is that when the
> guest acknowledges an LPI by reading ICC_IAR1_EL1, we mark it as not
> pending in the data structure but still leave it in cs->hppi so will
> offer it to the guest again.
>
> The effect is that if we are using an emulated GICv3 and ITS and
> using devices which use LPIs (ie PCI devices) then Linux will
> complain "irq 54: nobody cared" and then hang (probably because the
> stale bogus interrupt info meant we never tried to deliver some other
> real interrupt).
Hmm; this is definitely a bug, but maybe it's not the cause of
the symptoms listed above -- I've just seen them again even
with this fix. I'll keep digging...
-- PMM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-23 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-23 17:10 [for-6.2] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Update cached state after acknowledging LPI Peter Maydell
2021-11-23 17:46 ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2021-11-23 18:27 ` Alex Bennée
[not found] ` <233AD939-3A37-4075-8430-8FFBC6A04836@hxcore.ol>
2021-11-24 17:09 ` Peter Maydell
2021-11-23 17:55 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFEAcA8XMtAHKY=saAajLc2b03_PHGi+G=iioEpeetuS3Hh5yg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shashi.mallela@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).