From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53473)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1QfCH3-0001mX-4O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:43:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1QfCGs-0005wI-Qf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:43:20 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:33228)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1QfCGo-0005sb-48
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:43:06 -0400
Received: by pzk30 with SMTP id 30so1855382pzk.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 07:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E16FFE0.7050709@redhat.com>
References: <4E148776.4000805@redhat.com> <4E149B3F.2010709@redhat.com>
	<4E14BF36.3080803@codemonkey.ws>
	<6E6E2CFC-B5BB-4E1D-945D-1F13C604330B@suse.de>
	<4E155CB9.4020009@redhat.com> <4E15608D.5000201@redhat.com>
	<4E16FFE0.7050709@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:43:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA8Z27JPitMZh5Arh84-1sReSd84Ldra7J4CuAEiTNMLKw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] migration: new sections and backward compatibility.
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>

On 8 July 2011 14:02, Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> wrote:
> It seems reasonable to me to introduce a situation where devices have to
> explicitly marked as migration compatible and fail if there are devices
> in the system which are not.

To ask a dumb question: does "migration" here mean only "migration"
or also "vmsave/vmload" ?

-- PMM