From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbEVf-0001Gh-7E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:59:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbEVa-00035a-RJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:59:23 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]:40821) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbEVa-00034c-Ko for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:59:18 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id eh20so243250lab.39 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:59:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <878uxbx5y0.fsf@linaro.org> References: <87bo28vt03.fsf@linaro.org> <878uxbx5y0.fsf@linaro.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:58:57 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Checking the state of arm64-linux-user List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= Cc: Andreas Schwab , Michael Matz , Claudio Fontana , qemu-devel qemu-devel , Alexander Graf On 29 October 2013 18:55, Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote: > I think the problem is arm64 has been posted in several dependant patch > sets hence working from a git tree. I think for now I'll take off the > -Werror training wheels and see how far it gets. http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-09/msg04503.html is Alex's patchset which he rebased on to a qemu master, so if you can't wait for v2 then that's the one to look at. -- PMM