From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>,
Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>,
Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@nxp.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
G Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: mark the PCIe host controller as DMA coherent in the DT
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 14:31:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA8bSu4pjE5rfFzMNx7S0CfTSnaqmw9YLbWVK4ufzPP+1w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160701114006.w7cjhvfnj5cg3ks7@hawk.localdomain>
On 1 July 2016 at 12:40, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> I might have mentioned in the commit message that the ACPI generation
> already does this, as _CCA is set to 1, added with commit bc64b96c
> (assuming I'm right, and a value of 1 there is the ACPI equivalent of
> this patch)
>
> bc64b96c's commit message is also lacking, in the fact it doesn't
> state why the value of 1 is chosen, only that the attribute is
> compulsory, which I presume could have been added with the value 0
> to satisfy that.
>
> Anyway, I just wanted to point out that I *think* we're fine for
> ACPI. Perhaps I'm the only one who didn't know that already though...
Thanks for the update: I've edited the commit message to add:
# This brings the DT description into line with the ACPI description,
# which already marks the PCI bridge as cache coherent (see commit
# bc64b96c984abf).
thanks
-- PMM
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-01 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-28 17:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: mark the PCIe host controller as DMA coherent in the DT Ard Biesheuvel
2016-06-30 14:09 ` Peter Maydell
2016-07-01 11:40 ` Andrew Jones
2016-07-01 13:07 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-01 13:31 ` Peter Maydell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFEAcA8bSu4pjE5rfFzMNx7S0CfTSnaqmw9YLbWVK4ufzPP+1w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bogdan.purcareata@nxp.com \
--cc=crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@linaro.org \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).