Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.4] watchdog/diag288: correctly register for system reset requests

[Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>]

On 9 July 2015 at 17:16, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:31:40 +0200
>> Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> OTOH, this is less code than I expected. With the following code, I see
>>> the diag288 reset callback called on system reset. If this looks good,
>>> I can resend as a proper patch; we can reduce Xu's patch to the
>>> io_subsystem_reset() part in that case. Opinions?
>>
>
> I'm for sending that new core patch, as I'm suspicious I can make it
> fail in other places than your diag case. Runtime reset is poorly
> exercised code so I think you are going to pickup half-a-dozen
> bugfixes here.

FWIW this patch would mean we would try to call dc->reset on
the ARM CPU devices; the only reason this doesn't cause a
problem is that those devices don't happen to register a
dc->reset function pointer. (It's this sort of "now we start
calling a reset method on a device that was probably doing its
own reset via another path" that meant I wasn't too keen on it
for 2.4, though quite possibly it would work out better than
the ad-hoc reset we have currently in the longer term...)

-- PMM