qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] aarch64: -device virtio-scsi-device, id=scsi: No 'virtio-bus' bus found for device 'virtio-scsi-device'
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:59:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA8f3L908f7RHkMDakJSNo1yKnymK68Repr8K3Bg196eiw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53318EFD.5030304@redhat.com>

On 25 March 2014 14:13, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 25/03/2014 15:04, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>> Yes, default for qemu-system-aarch64 is integratorcp,
>> which even stupider than having that be the default
>> for qemu-system-arm.
>>
>> For 2.1 when the system emulation stuff actually lands
>> I think I'll just remove the default and force users
>> to specify a machine. (In fact it's very tempting to
>> do that for qemu-system-arm as well since the set of
>> users who don't specify a machine because they expect
>> ARM to be like x86 here is much larger than the set of
>> users who really wanted integratorcp...)
>
>
> Could "virt" be a sane default for qemu-system-arm?
>  2.0 might be the right time to change it.

Really I don't think there is a sane default at all for
ARM. Boards are just too different and you must know
which one you want. Anything other than "the user
must always specify" is just too confusing for people
who are expecting something closer to x86 monoculture.

If we want to remove the default for both for 2.0
I'm happy to do that -- it's a oneliner.

thanks
-- PMM

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-25 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-25 13:30 [Qemu-devel] aarch64: -device virtio-scsi-device, id=scsi: No 'virtio-bus' bus found for device 'virtio-scsi-device' Richard W.M. Jones
2014-03-25 13:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-25 14:04   ` Peter Maydell
2014-03-25 14:13     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-25 18:59       ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2014-03-26  9:51         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-26 10:36           ` Peter Maydell
2014-03-25 14:17   ` Richard W.M. Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFEAcA8f3L908f7RHkMDakJSNo1yKnymK68Repr8K3Bg196eiw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rjones@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).