From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBwdu-0000dk-1M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 03:18:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBwdo-0007DL-Iv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 03:18:32 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x344.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::344]:40249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBwdg-00077v-Tv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 03:18:25 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-x344.google.com with SMTP id t8so1413468otp.7 for ; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:18:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1554321185-2825-1-git-send-email-sandra@codesourcery.com> <1554321185-2825-3-git-send-email-sandra@codesourcery.com> <88a32d60-aaf5-0625-a798-24ebf3b288a6@codesourcery.com> <5a4d38da-3ccc-b019-3f30-54cd364f7544@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <5a4d38da-3ccc-b019-3f30-54cd364f7544@codesourcery.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:18:08 +0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 2/2] Add Nios II semihosting support. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sandra Loosemore Cc: QEMU Developers , Chris Wulff , Marek Vasut On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 14:13, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > > On 4/4/19 1:00 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 13:44, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > >> > >> On 4/3/19 11:59 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > >>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 02:53, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > >>>> > >>>> This patch adds support for libgloss semihosting to Nios II bare-metal > >>>> emulation. The specification for the protocol can be found in the > >>>> libgloss sources. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Sandra Loosemore > >>>> Signed-off-by: Julian Brown > >>> > >>> I gave a reviewed-by tag for this patch in v6 -- has something changed > >>> in v7 that made that no longer able to carry across? > >> > >> I fixed the formatting problems you asked me to address. What else am I > >> supposed to do? I don't understand what you mean about the tag. > > > > If somebody provides you with a Reviewed-by tag and you submit > > a fresh version of the patchset then you should include that tag in > > your commit message; that records that the patch has been reviewed > > so that people know it doesn't need to be looked at again. > > https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch#Proper_use_of_Reviewed-by:_tags_can_aid_review > > Hmmm, OK; I missed that. So do I need to resubmit the patches just to > add that tag? No, not at this point. I'll just add one here: Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell which should cause the automated tooling to pick it up when it gets applied to somebody's tree for a pullreq. thanks -- PMM