From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50107)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1bIVyK-0008Ks-3e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 03:01:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1bIVyJ-00089T-0R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 03:01:12 -0400
Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b]:36161)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1bIVyI-00089L-FX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 03:01:10 -0400
Received: by mail-vk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id m127so37857771vkb.3
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAC0+NVbmjy4Da_0PtS51bQfwKqKAH9_500UudGTpum2pJRHgrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC0+NVahfpByKmWCd=0xuDSMoGBnW0h1VrCDeUeV1x01XUQFVA@mail.gmail.com>
	<878txpd1u7.fsf@fimbulvetr.bsc.es>
	<CAFEAcA9AGEPfGRTEQnp0fKKPScoPgB7kQn5WbefORNPih--qfw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC0+NVbmjy4Da_0PtS51bQfwKqKAH9_500UudGTpum2pJRHgrQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:00:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA8h7Bpasn9PwU438UUo4JUombvByKRZDRO8Mh-pj2Spjg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Executed Host Instructions
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Ayaz Akram <aaqemu@gmail.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 30 June 2016 at 02:13, Ayaz Akram <aaqemu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all !
> I hope you wouldn't mind a quick clarification regarding this question . If
> I do not take into account the exceptions and keep on adding number of
> translated instructions inside a TB (found through -d out_asm) for each time
> TB is seen in the exec trace (found through -d exec and nochaining), the
> total number of instructions will overestimate the actual number of executed
> host instructions (only for the translated code) ?

Yes, it will be (potentially) an overestimate.

thanks
-- PMM