From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52177) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VL9f3-0000kn-RX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 06:34:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VL9ey-0005pH-Vm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 06:34:37 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]:38167) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VL9ey-0005nn-OZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 06:34:32 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x18so3398588lbi.3 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 03:34:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <52349E4C.9030902@weilnetz.de> References: <52349E4C.9030902@weilnetz.de> From: Peter Maydell Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 11:34:10 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug] qemu-alpha broken on 32 bit hosts List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: qemu-devel , Richard Henderson On 14 September 2013 18:35, Stefan Weil wrote: > All (?) syscalls fail to handle addresses larger than 32 bit correctly. > See "Bad address" in the strace ouput below. Isn't "64 bit guest on 32 bit host" in the set of "things we don't expect to work" ? Maybe I'm misremembering... -- PMM