From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45229) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TaWAj-0007lL-MM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:34:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TaWAb-0003Xj-Mx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:34:17 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173]:59269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TaWAb-0003Vn-Io for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:34:09 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id k14so3160288iea.4 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:34:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1353343228-24870-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:34:06 +0000 Message-ID: From: Peter Maydell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] LICENSE: clarify licensing List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: malc Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 19 November 2012 18:21, malc wrote: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> +5) Files without explicit licenses fall under the GPL v2. > > I have issue with this, files without licenses are just that files > without licenses. If we believe this (and it seems a logical thing to believe) then QEMU's not distributable until we rewrite or remove or track down all authors for all the files without licenses... -- PMM