From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50619) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHoC2-0004im-7P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:16:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHoC0-0000UR-7p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:16:25 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::236]:34836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHoBz-0000UH-QP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:16:24 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id j2so11975276vkg.2 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 01:16:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1466528974-12183-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> References: <1466528974-12183-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:16:03 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 0/6] Runtime pagesize computation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-arm , QEMU Developers Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Vijaya Kumar K , Patch Tracking On 21 June 2016 at 18:09, Peter Maydell wrote: > This set of patches is a development based on the ones from Vijaya: > the general idea is similar but I have tried to improve the interface > for defining the page size a bit. I've also tweaked patches 2 and 3 > to address code review comments. > NB: I have only very lightly tested these and haven't attempted > to measure performance at all. There is an assert() in the > definition of TARGET_PAGE_BITS which is good for making sure > it isn't used before it's valid but not so good for speed. Vijaya, are you in a position to test this patchset for performance? Presumably you have a test case benchmark you're looking to improve here? thanks -- PMM