From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkw9P-0000Tk-NM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:15:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkw9I-0005fh-FQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:15:27 -0500 Received: from mail-qw0-f52.google.com ([209.85.216.52]:58687) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkw9I-0005fX-DG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:15:20 -0500 Received: by qafl39 with SMTP id l39so378440qaf.4 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:15:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1326271428-15648-1-git-send-email-javier@dowhile0.org> References: <1326271428-15648-1-git-send-email-javier@dowhile0.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:15:19 +0000 Message-ID: From: Peter Maydell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] hw: Add IGEPv2 board support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linaro-toolchain On 11 January 2012 08:43, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Add ISEE IGEPv2 board definition (an OMAP3730 based board). > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas It's polite to mention that patches are against qemu-linaro if you cc qemu-devel. So my initial reaction to this is to ask what the benefit is of adding another basically-just-an-OMAP3 model. We already have beagle and overo, and this is obviously just cut-n-paste from overo (it still has the comment about "FAB revisions" which is specific to Overo, which doesn't give me a great deal of confidence that this is actually correctly modelling the IGEPv2 rather than just something random which happens to be able to boot an IGEPv2 kernel...) GPLv2-only rather than v2-or-later is also going to be a problem, although I appreciate that that's because you've based this on the v2-only overo.c [which is going to be a problem for me later on when I try to upstream that :-)] -- PMM