From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42819) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHA5o-00032a-Nq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:50:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHA5k-00043t-MI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:50:32 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42]:55910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YHA5k-00043n-Fs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:50:28 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id ms9so23214590lab.1 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 03:50:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <54CB6FA7.5040701@redhat.com> References: <54CA6CF6.7090308@redhat.com> <54CA7BF5.8020800@redhat.com> <54CA8637.2080306@redhat.com> <54CA8E37.8070009@redhat.com> <20150130095456.GB27572@redhat.com> <20150130104833.GC27572@redhat.com> <54CB6D36.9070305@redhat.com> <54CB6FA7.5040701@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:50:07 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] address order of virtio-mmio devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: qemu devel list On 30 January 2015 at 11:48, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 01/30/15 12:40, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Just as a sanity check, do we actually have an old kernel that >> enumerates in the opposite order (as opposed to my two-year-old >> "I'm sure this used to be right" memories...) ? > > I never saw one. :) That's why I asked in my first message if anyone had > actually tested that loop / comment. Well, I *think* I did, because I remember the go-round about it and I wouldn't have written weird code like that without a reason. But it's two years ago now... -- PMM