From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g7JsP-0001Pu-Cc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 08:34:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g7Jp2-00080N-G9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 08:30:42 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::244]:40864) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g7Jp0-0007yS-Ll for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 08:30:40 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-x244.google.com with SMTP id j68-v6so1323811oib.7 for ; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 05:30:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180927211322.16118-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> References: <20180927211322.16118-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 13:30:10 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/9] target/arm: Rely on id regs instead of features List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: QEMU Developers On 27 September 2018 at 22:13, Richard Henderson wrote: > There are more feature bits that could be converted, but I thought > I should show the work to this point to get feedback. > > This is the "v2" as compared to > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-09/msg01849.html So having written the code both ways round, which do you think works out nicer? (or at least least-worst :-)) thanks -- PMM