From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsGyN-00060R-CV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:03:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsGyI-0000qc-Gg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:03:27 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:47220) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsGyI-0000qS-AU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:03:22 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id y13so4392248pdi.5 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 11:03:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <52ADFA17.2000109@suse.de> References: <1368475464-3116-1-git-send-email-green@moxielogic.com> <8761qqn496.fsf@moxielogic.com> <52ADFA17.2000109@suse.de> From: Peter Maydell Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:03:01 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ping.. Re: [PATCH moxie] Fix bug in tlb_fill. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= Cc: QEMU Trivial , Anthony Green , QEMU Developers , Max Filippov , Anthony Liguori , Richard Henderson On 15 December 2013 18:51, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > Am 15.12.2013 05:10, schrieb Anthony Green: >> This patch still needs to be applied. There was some follow-up >> discussion on this patch back in May, but none of it negates the fact >> that this patch needs to be applied. > > It introduces a tab, please fix. > > Apart from that I believe I reported some inconsistencies between > targets in that function, so "all targets except moxie do it conditional > to FOO" may be a convincing explanation independent of the bug you were > discussing that may or may not be otherwise workaroundable. I dug out the thread where you did that (which turns out to be private mail and not qemu-devel). In follow up to that RTH and I agreed that it definitely is a bug and this patch is the correct fix. > And since this is purely in target-moxie I would suggest to simply send > a pull as target maintainer once you have someone trustworthy's > Reviewed-by and it doesn't break `make check`, similar to how it's done > for OpenRISC. Yes, this makes sense to me, especially since Anthony has a number of other moxie patches on list at this point. thanks -- PMM