From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49855)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1ZoDdL-0001ym-Ej
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:50:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1ZoDdI-0006Or-72
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:50:03 -0400
Received: from mail-vk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:35052)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1ZoDdI-0006Ok-3D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:50:00 -0400
Received: by vkfw189 with SMTP id w189so23798753vkf.2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 09:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPokK=q6j2Tc2ASKTpxB16UU=F9D6t8LpC84XbWmYfnuyUw1_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1443931379.git.crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
	<CAPokK=q6j2Tc2ASKTpxB16UU=F9D6t8LpC84XbWmYfnuyUw1_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:49:40 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA99M3CTowOR3OWjwxc3FWLvCZ+Qv06WNhYkgxmDQ-xHWA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/3] ARM: Machine specific boot blobs
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaitepeter@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>

On 18 October 2015 at 17:25, Peter Crosthwaite
<crosthwaitepeter@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ping!
>
> Although a little featurish and RFCish, this does repair the boot of
> two ARM machines so it is very much a bugfix and we should consider
> for 2.5. Otherwise we go to release (again) with two broken machines.

The general idea looks ok to me, but sending a patchset out labelled
RFC when we hit softfreeze is a pretty good way to cause people to
ignore it :-)

Patch 1 looks OK I think; haven't looked too closely at the others.

How are you picking the firmware blob addresses ?

thanks
-- PMM