From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47765) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ri1dY-00074z-Q2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 05:30:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ri1dT-0001Ll-6D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 05:30:32 -0500 Received: from mail-qw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:42639) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ri1dT-0001Le-2f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 05:30:27 -0500 Received: by qadc10 with SMTP id c10so9134000qad.4 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 02:30:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 10:30:26 +0000 Message-ID: From: Peter Maydell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] virtio-mmio: fix 2 bugs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ying-Shiuan Pan Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 3 January 2012 07:05, Ying-Shiuan Pan wrote: > I'm not sure if it is appropriate to put patches here because > virtio-mmio is actually not in official repository yet. > In case that someone else wants to test virtio-mmio as I did, I decide > to send them out. > > Currently, I've successfully tested virtio-blk, virtio-net, and virtio-balloon. Thanks for tracking down these bugs and providing fixes. If it's OK with you, I think I'll simply fold them in to my patches, since they haven't been submitted upstream yet (the virtio subsystem needs splitting out to have a cleaner backend/transport separation first). -- PMM