From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50675) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZNMM-000184-P3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:11:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZNMI-0005cM-Lb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:11:10 -0400 Received: from mail-yk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.160.175]:33445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZNMI-0005c9-Gn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:11:06 -0400 Received: by ykei199 with SMTP id i199so131665474yke.0 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 11:11:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 19:10:45 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] typofixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Veres Lajos Cc: QEMU Trivial , Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel On 8 September 2015 at 19:01, Veres Lajos wrote: > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> Veres: can you drop the libvixl and linux-headers changes, >> and at least split the remainder into docs/comments vs >> code changes, and resend the patches to qemu-devel, please? > > I have removed the linux-headers/ and disas/libvixl/ changes. > And I think the only non-comment/non-doc change is this: > tests/qemu-iotests/041 > - def test_unexistant_replaces(self): > + def test_unexistent_replaces(self): > > If you want I can move this to another patch. OK, if there's just the one that's fine. You forgot your signed-off-by line; we can't take the patch without one. Also, please can you send it inline rather than as an attachment? There are several places here which want a better phrasing rather than just a typo fix, but it's hard to comment on a patch provided as an attachment. (For instance, that should be 'nonexistent', not 'unexistent' in that functionname; 'be deferring' should be 'by deferring' in pl181.c, 'notable' should be 'notably' in various bits of decNumber.c, ...) thanks -- PMM