From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Qiuhao Li <Qiuhao.Li@outlook.com>
Cc: "Alexander Bulekov" <alxndr@bu.edu>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Alistair Francis" <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rtl8139: fix stack overflow if RxBuf overlaps MMIO
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:02:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA9Wpc_-pcwGU+=MbRpEb5x5=qPsBP2APvdRe4gK6+WAVA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SYCPR01MB3502B0D05FEB1ED21532219EFCAA0@SYCPR01MB3502.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 at 15:23, Qiuhao Li <Qiuhao.Li@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Fix Bug 1910826 [1] / OSS-Fuzz Issue 29224 [2].
>
> In rtl8139.c, the function rtl8139_RxBuf_write, which sets the RxBuf
> (Receive Buffer Start Address), doesn't check if this buffer overlaps our
> MMIO region. So if the guest machine set the transmit mode to loopback, put
> the RxBuf at the address of TSD (Transmit Status of Descriptor, MMIO), and
> trigger a frame transfer by directly writing to the TSD, an infinite
> recursion will occur:
>
> rtl8139_ioport_write (to TSD) -> rtl8139_io_writel -> rtl8139_transmit ->
> rtl8139_transmit_one -> rtl8139_transfer_frame -> rtl8139_do_receive ->
> rtl8139_write_buffer -> pci_dma_write (to TSD) -> ... ->
> rtl8139_ioport_write (to TSD)
>
> This patch adds a check to ensure the maximum possible RxBuf [3] won't
> overlap the MMIO region.
>
> P.S. There is a more concise reproducer with comments [4], which may help :)
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910826
> [2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=29224
> [3] https://www.cs.usfca.edu/~cruse/cs326f04/RTL8139D_DataSheet.pdf
> 5.7 Transmit Configuration Register
> [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1910826/comments/1
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiuhao Li <Qiuhao.Li@outlook.com>
> Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
This looks like a single-device workaround for the generic
class of problems where a device can be configured to
do DMA to itself. Why is rtl8139 special ?
(I have on my todo list to think about the general problem.)
thanks
-- PMM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-12 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-12 15:05 [RFC PATCH] rtl8139: fix stack overflow if RxBuf overlaps MMIO Qiuhao Li
2021-01-12 16:02 ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2021-01-13 1:18 ` Qiuhao Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFEAcA9Wpc_-pcwGU+=MbRpEb5x5=qPsBP2APvdRe4gK6+WAVA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=Qiuhao.Li@outlook.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=alxndr@bu.edu \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).