From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yrehan@gmail.com>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Update the id of Vexpress Cortex-A9 from r0p0 to r0p1?
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 21:10:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA9aSCanX-mgST7PSnkGyh32iRtSwm0zr3i-wMeeUXsyXQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC_HJnyx+TiMqAf=5D1Vq-rFVAe3bzDFcqR0j7X1+64JSjxdGA@mail.gmail.com>
On 6 October 2013 20:12, Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yrehan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Default vexpress_defconfig does not boot on qemu vexpress-a9 target. In kernel,
> vexpress uart detection for DEBUG_LL is done using Coretex-A9 id. Only r0p1 is
> mapped to legacy map. All other variants are mapped to RS1/aseries map.
Detecting the board model based on the CPU revision-and-patchlevel is a
horrible hack and I wish the kernel guys would drop it.
Really the kernel should provide a way to specify (in the device tree
or otherwise)
where the UART is, in a way that the early kernel code can easily get at to use
for its earlyprint uart.
> As qemu vexpress-a9 target reports Cortex-A9 version as r0p0, kernel maps uart0
> at address 0x1c090000 instead of 0x10009000. This result in kernel indefinitely
> waiting for uart during boot. A kernel patch to fix this was discussed
> in the following link
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/269657 .
> In this discussion Pawel Moll mentioned that V2P-CA9 has Cortex-A9 r0p1 and not
> r0p0. If this is correct, to fix this and similar future problems, shouldn't
> qemu Cortex-A9 be updated to version r0p1?
The trouble is that QEMU models CPUs and boards separately and
doesn't model every single variant/patchlevel of each CPU, because
that would be a fairly large amount of extra effort.
> So what will it take to update the id of Cortex-A9 in qemu from r0p0 to r0p1?
If we're updating, why would we update only to r0p1 and not to the most
recent rev/patchlevel?
The major thing we need is a mechanism for allowing at least the
board, and possibly also the user, to specify properties of the cpu
like "which rev/patchlevel is it" (being able to specify "do we have an
fpu/neon/etc" is a similar thing).
If we had that it would not be too hard to then have the vexpress-a9
board specify which rev/patchlevel to use. But we don't have the
mechanism currently.
-- PMM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-06 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-06 11:12 [Qemu-devel] Update the id of Vexpress Cortex-A9 from r0p0 to r0p1? Mian Yousaf Kaukab
2013-10-06 12:10 ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2013-10-06 17:26 ` Andreas Färber
2013-10-07 0:57 ` Peter Maydell
2013-10-07 20:17 ` Mian Yousaf Kaukab
2013-10-07 23:06 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFEAcA9aSCanX-mgST7PSnkGyh32iRtSwm0zr3i-wMeeUXsyXQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yrehan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).