From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56156)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1SWPyL-00062c-HS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 06:36:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1SWPyF-0003Uf-7x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 06:36:17 -0400
Received: from mail-gg0-f173.google.com ([209.85.161.173]:55932)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1SWPyF-0003UI-3Z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 06:36:11 -0400
Received: by ggnp1 with SMTP id p1so5249239ggn.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 21 May 2012 03:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <842600711.2527751.1337584877321.JavaMail.www@wwinf8221>
References: <1512121653.606644.1337094765947.JavaMail.www@wwinf8306>
	<4FB27400.3010908@suse.de>
	<27874590.608345.1337095907076.JavaMail.www@wwinf8306>
	<4FB28591.4090709@suse.de>
	<189253069.454583.1337155108168.JavaMail.www@wwinf8304>
	<CAAu8pHvjFr1KsRHGv5ZidpkjixLBmtxrgLX3z39F8W65vyxwPA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFEAcA8Zukx1zY=GD9ARZtGX8gBYRcSQh7-yUSmEPccL6GVqcg@mail.gmail.com>
	<842600711.2527751.1337584877321.JavaMail.www@wwinf8221>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:36:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA9c_anXK3nQVMTUbkWZcTtSnuxqxd9Tm4EGL3DBfHBqMQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Get current env within io_handler ?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "nicolas.sauzede" <nicolas.sauzede@laposte.net>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 21 May 2012 08:21, nicolas.sauzede <nicolas.sauzede@laposte.net> wrote:
> Ok, so I guess that for now, we have to live with the lack of a way to actually
> get those io transaction properties, right ?
> Do you think it would be feasible to allow it the future ? (for now, I've done
> some shortcuts and ugly hardcoding in my TLM prototype to make things work, but still..)
>
> In fact, we encounter the same kind of issues regarding the "debug" property when doing
> io transaction.

> Do you think this feature could be useful/legitimate in upstream qemu ?

I think it would be nice to have this in upstream qemu; however adding
transaction properties to the IO interface would be quite tricky I
suspect...

-- PMM