From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45681) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjAnQ-0003v4-Sf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 14:47:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjAnM-0000e8-Sh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 14:47:36 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.213.43]:34908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjAnM-0000e3-OW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 14:47:32 -0400 Received: by vkao3 with SMTP id o3so102464760vka.2 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 11:47:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151005181113.GK1260@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> References: <1441619584-17992-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1441619584-17992-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <55FAE3A9.5090907@redhat.com> <55FAEB33.50809@redhat.com> <20151005181113.GK1260@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:47:12 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] checkpatch: adapt some tests to QEMU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: Paolo Bonzini , QEMU Developers , Markus Armbruster , Andreas Faerber On 5 October 2015 at 19:11, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 07:44:29PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 17 September 2015 at 17:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 17/09/2015 18:16, Peter Maydell wrote: >> >> On 17 September 2015 at 17:00, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 17/09/2015 16:24, Peter Maydell wrote: >> >>>> Can we revert this one, please? Checkpatch now warns about constructs >> >>>> like >> >>>> typedef struct MyDevice { >> >>>> DeviceState parent; >> >>>> >> >>>> int reg0, reg1, reg2; >> >>>> } MyDevice; >> >> > I think it varies depending on the maintainer. PPC, USB, SCSI, ACPI all >> > use a separate typedef. I'll prepare a revert. >> >> Ping on that revert patch? I can't find it onlist... > > The x86 pull request I sent today triggers this error, BTW. I hope it > won't make the pull request be automatically rejected. Nope, because I don't run checkpatch on pull requests. -- PMM