From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42389) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ygb1X-0007ZE-M5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:39:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ygb1U-0003HU-Sx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:39:15 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]:37618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ygb1U-0003HE-Ok for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:39:12 -0400 Received: by igblo3 with SMTP id lo3so989653igb.0 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 08:39:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2195639.EYFYKnq51Z@sifl> References: <5525EB8B.5030501@suse.de> <2186908.62XuPTZaqu@sifl> <2195639.EYFYKnq51Z@sifl> From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:38:51 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] seccomp breakage on arm List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Moore Cc: Marcus Meissner , Karl-Philipp Richter , Riku Voipio , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel , qemu-ppc , Eduardo Otubo , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= On 10 April 2015 at 16:16, Paul Moore wrote: > Both your tone and unsolicited advice have been noted. Sorry. Looking back you're correct that I was out of line here. One of my aspirations for QEMU as a project is that we can maintain a polite and civil level of conversation on our mailing list, and I fell below that this time. I'll try to do better in future. I have put looking at the libseccomp documentation on my todo list. -- PMM