From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56015) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4Rhc-0003EU-NC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 05:01:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4RhY-0003tS-CL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 05:01:00 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com ([209.85.217.180]:49977) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4RhY-0003tI-67 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 05:00:56 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id l4so8496589lbv.11 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 02:00:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1419581126-12927-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> References: <1419581126-12927-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 10:00:34 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm_irqchip_assign_irqfd: just set irqfd in case of kvm_irqfds_enabled() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Tiejun Chen Cc: QEMU Trivial , Paolo Bonzini , QEMU Developers , kvm-devel On 26 December 2014 at 08:05, Tiejun Chen wrote: > We should avoid to set irqfd{} unconditionally. > > Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen Is there a hot path that we use this on such that the difference in code order matters at all? thanks -- PMM