From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674D0C433DF for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 15:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FD4B20720 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 15:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="LYaLusCd" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2FD4B20720 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59952 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtYaa-0007hF-Gq for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 11:35:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtYVi-0004ok-SE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 11:30:55 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc2a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2a]:38149) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtYVg-0002wt-VZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 11:30:54 -0400 Received: by mail-oo1-xc2a.google.com with SMTP id x2so422533oog.5 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 08:30:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LZ2scqa74xY7+R2DH2sIaVzQl/Nm2D5IeCM5UcDtuAE=; b=LYaLusCd6QgLJlnxwWAVy1JPE08A9pbOHel3zwFXK1nEkN/oR6UN18GeBkr9qpLsE1 Z3IiVH/3F+IChLTvUJpwN4/uvonYdIobaBVCganuaBDqPXdUrlYK9q6FuWWeS2DepQ7o jQK74qKgtHAxFwLAN0V3RIMGBxwkot+E9i25/lUqcrxIxc00DQFMlesSsTCHHsQLRhds eBjhXA6hc5dufPjxFV8c2l1e21xWq1DScWVj9yGrnIpL41bt3YSRx1jqki03IM2Rcn7U M8azQKaV6MGAz20yXOIdv9MX4EdjugFvelujGQvWjR1VBrKA9ex2J6iabscD+ywz3bLE Zg4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LZ2scqa74xY7+R2DH2sIaVzQl/Nm2D5IeCM5UcDtuAE=; b=iD/GSmgpyb4VNgM9u7ONprctfocEevSL5a6X36CrBRhereo9hVJQ4oUwER1XvTb5U/ Os0ODhLwvLOnl1+a3BCyEiklGXc3jExrYP6k461oN8NkiA2S7k9ULPzf26ZTG4gfc0T/ AEhAYoNV06tLaR/Dwm6MXeVn1x4MxQ3zVsNE5QWn0acMHQBRYNId3haC2Z25WzchO2/h I8AThfI1hioMKItrMVcohkWyAusHM1IXkoXbtZj7ZzmeonU2Mtad0jSs4zDKq7yiLbpn +K8r5VxSEfv6HbJiJ55HziuUnfbWIKcIk6JDXJbTW4wrPpg4v4txSStKGWBVE77LvDFs CKeA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533C8AfwRCoh8mlSx9zY6ROLLnF+JkMGFGKHti2y1/Y00vXkxPNA UTniVC5aTaGDSCfRQqL4vhFNK1qvgcjS1KX1O8euaA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwP+Harkf0RReGW9soJ9+RdpgXkii9+ctQPWT0WYdRzgTP87yZtF1VFCGEtmkbznPRES8PiOO7m36F7PY2c7vI= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:9653:: with SMTP id r19mr33146168ooi.85.1594308651759; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 08:30:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2666aec2-9872-6af6-7705-d7ce553f611c@redhat.com> <20200709152630.GW3753300@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200709152630.GW3753300@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:30:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is VXHS actually maintained? To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2a; envelope-from=peter.maydell@linaro.org; helo=mail-oo1-xc2a.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Thomas Huth , Jeff Cody , QEMU , Max Reitz , =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYy1BbmRyw6kgTHVyZWF1?= , ashmit602@gmail.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 16:27, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 = wrote: > If it doesn't even compile, do we even need to go through the full > deprecation cycle ? I tend to feel like the release where it first > fails to compile automatically starts the deprecation countdown. Mmm, assuming that it's "couldn't possibly compile for anybody" rather than "doesn't compile for me (but maybe it would be OK on some other host OS config)". Marc-Andr=C3=A9, what are the details of the compilation failure? thanks -- PMM