From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56793)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1Se4JZ-0007Tr-8D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:05:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1Se4JS-0004pS-Qm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:05:48 -0400
Received: from mail-bk0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:63705)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1Se4JS-0004kR-Gw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:05:42 -0400
Received: by bkwj10 with SMTP id j10so3823459bkw.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7ceb9277-7b55-4105-be93-ec8acb7cf1fe@zmail13.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
References: <4FD2B105.2030202@suse.de>
	<7ceb9277-7b55-4105-be93-ec8acb7cf1fe@zmail13.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:05:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA_BS84s+RMEPi_ijKp5GkSTJqarp=uPjGiOEO83e5YtkQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QOMification of AXI stream
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>, "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>, =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>, John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>

On 11 June 2012 06:54, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> I think AXI counts as a point-to-point link, so no bus.

Depends what you mean by AXI. In general an AXI bus fabric
can have multiple masters and slaves connected via an
interconnect, but we probably don't actually want to model
the interconnect as a separate device...

-- PMM