From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkuPl-0001Ma-90 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:46:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkuPg-0001DF-02 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:46:52 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]:36758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkuPf-0001Bx-57 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:46:47 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id m62so30547165vkd.3 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:46:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160916163955.3460f28b@bahia> References: <1474031354-14185-1-git-send-email-groug@kaod.org> <20160916163955.3460f28b@bahia> From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:46:26 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] 9p patches for 2.8 20160916 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Greg Kurz Cc: QEMU Developers , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" On 16 September 2016 at 15:39, Greg Kurz wrote: > Ok, I'll look into it... but the important part in this pull request is > the "9pfs: fix potential segfault during walk" patch. It fixes a regression > introduced in 2.7 by the 9P security fixes. And IIUC, Michael Roth is about > to release 2.6.1.1 with these fixes and the regression... > > Should I send a new pull request without the qtest patches ? Or with the > regression fix only ? That's up to you, as long as you don't break "make check". You probably want to investigate at least enough to be happy that this problem is a bug in the test code, not the feature itself. thanks -- PMM