From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52599) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCYE-0001Kl-Te for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:37:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCY9-0005vK-S7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:36:58 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com ([209.85.217.178]:40311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCY9-0005vD-Kl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:36:53 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id s7so4205608lbd.9 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:36:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <53309E95.1080206@ilande.co.uk> References: <532B94FF.4090809@caramail.com> <53309E95.1080206@ilande.co.uk> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:36:32 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] sparc : 32bits integer division overflow List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mark Cave-Ayland Cc: Blue Swirl , Richard Henderson , Olivier Danet , qemu-devel On 24 March 2014 21:07, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > This patch fixes the original bug report, and doesn't appear to have any > ill-effects on my SPARC32/SPARC64 image collection boot tests so: > > Tested-by: Mark Cave-Ayland > > Peter - given that this prevents a guest from crashing the QEMU host, is it > a candidate for 2.0? Yes, I think so -- it's small and self-contained, it fixes a crash bug, and it's been reviewed. If you want to put it in a pull request I'll apply it. thanks -- PMM