From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkD5y-00032u-UP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:54:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkD5u-0006Yh-Og for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:54:46 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]:35952) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkD5u-0006YL-LY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:54:42 -0400 Received: by iebrs15 with SMTP id rs15so118080915ieb.3 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 07:54:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1427994155-25043-1-git-send-email-marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> <1427994155-25043-4-git-send-email-marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> <20150414142507.GI4131@wheatley> <552D3B24.4020803@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:54:20 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH 3/5] qemu: add QEMU_CAPS_MACHINE_VMPORT_OPT List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYy1BbmRyw6kgTHVyZWF1?= Cc: Martin Kletzander , Libvirt , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 20 April 2015 at 13:39, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> >> > + { "machine", "vmport", QEMU_CAPS_MACHINE_VMPORT_OPT }, >> >> Ouch. qemu commit 0a7cf21 fixes what would have been a regression in >> 2.3 at exposing "mem-merge" through query-command-line-options, but it >> does NOT expose "vmport", which is a per-architecture option rather than >> a generic -machine option. Which means that even though qemu 2.2 >> (perhaps wrongly) advertised "vmport" for all machines (even when it was >> not supported), 2.3 will not advertise it, and we are hoping for a >> better solution in 2.4 for properly advertising vmport on an >> as-appropriate basis. > > > Thanks Eric for finding out this regression. > > Is anybody working on a better solution? I can imagine either a new qmp > machine-list-properties, or perhaps more reasonably a new properties arra= y > in query-machines reply. Unless this is an absolutely critical "we cannot ship 2.3 without a fix" bug (in which case somebody should yell now and you really need a patch on the list within a day or so), you've probably missed the 2.3 boat at this point. -- PMM