From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59399) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnrZT-0001pB-RY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 11:39:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnrZO-0004jy-Qx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 11:39:47 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com ([209.85.217.178]:45144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnrZO-0004ju-JW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 11:39:42 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w7so2857369lbi.37 for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 08:39:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1400805738-11889-1-git-send-email-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 16:39:21 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/21] target-arm: Preparations for A64 EL2 and 3 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Edgar E. Iglesias" Cc: Rob Herring , Peter Crosthwaite , Fabian Aggeler , QEMU Developers , Alexander Graf , John Williams , =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= , Christoffer Dall , Richard Henderson On 23 May 2014 13:54, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 23 May 2014 01:41, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: >> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" >> >> Hi, >> >> I've been doing some work on modeling parts of EL2 and 3 + some of >> the system-wide virtualization features for ARMv8. A lot is missing >> but I've got a series with enough to for example run KVM A64 guests >> on top of EL3 firmware inside emulated QEMU A64 VMs. >> I'm working on cleaning things up and plan to send patches and publish >> things as I go. >> >> This series does a first round of preparations. Most of it has little >> or no user visible impact as the EL2 and 3 features remain disabled. >> >> Happy to address any comments people may have. > > Thanks, applied to target-arm.next. Given the issues I found in testing I'm unapplying them again. I just sent some patches to list which should fix them; you should probably incorporate those (or equivalents) into v5. thanks -- PMM