* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pl190: fix read of VECTADDR
@ 2012-08-18 2:55 Brendan Fennell
2012-08-18 10:00 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Fennell @ 2012-08-18 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: peter.maydell, Brendan Fennell
Signed-off-by: Brendan Fennell <bfennell@skynet.ie>
---
hw/pl190.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/pl190.c b/hw/pl190.c
index cb50afb..d69d5be 100644
--- a/hw/pl190.c
+++ b/hw/pl190.c
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static uint64_t pl190_read(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t offset,
s->priority = i;
pl190_update(s);
}
- return s->vect_addr[s->priority];
+ return s->vect_addr[s->priority - 1];
case 13: /* DEFVECTADDR */
return s->vect_addr[16];
default:
--
1.7.2.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pl190: fix read of VECTADDR
2012-08-18 2:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pl190: fix read of VECTADDR Brendan Fennell
@ 2012-08-18 10:00 ` Peter Maydell
2012-08-18 10:41 ` Brendan Fennell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2012-08-18 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brendan Fennell; +Cc: qemu-devel
On 18 August 2012 03:55, Brendan Fennell <bfennell@skynet.ie> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Fennell <bfennell@skynet.ie>
> ---
> hw/pl190.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/pl190.c b/hw/pl190.c
> index cb50afb..d69d5be 100644
> --- a/hw/pl190.c
> +++ b/hw/pl190.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static uint64_t pl190_read(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t offset,
> s->priority = i;
> pl190_update(s);
> }
> - return s->vect_addr[s->priority];
> + return s->vect_addr[s->priority - 1];
> case 13: /* DEFVECTADDR */
> return s->vect_addr[16];
> default:
This doesn't look right -- if s->priority is zero then we'll read off
the beginning of the array.
What's the actual bug you're trying to fix here?
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pl190: fix read of VECTADDR
2012-08-18 10:00 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2012-08-18 10:41 ` Brendan Fennell
2012-08-18 12:20 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Fennell @ 2012-08-18 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: qemu-devel
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 18 August 2012 03:55, Brendan Fennell <bfennell@skynet.ie> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Brendan Fennell <bfennell@skynet.ie>
>> ---
>> hw/pl190.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/pl190.c b/hw/pl190.c
>> index cb50afb..d69d5be 100644
>> --- a/hw/pl190.c
>> +++ b/hw/pl190.c
>> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static uint64_t pl190_read(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t offset,
>> s->priority = i;
>> pl190_update(s);
>> }
>> - return s->vect_addr[s->priority];
>> + return s->vect_addr[s->priority - 1];
>> case 13: /* DEFVECTADDR */
>> return s->vect_addr[16];
>> default:
>
> This doesn't look right -- if s->priority is zero then we'll read off
> the beginning of the array.
> What's the actual bug you're trying to fix here?
The bug is that when, for example, interrupt 4 triggers the VECTADDR of
interrupt 5 is returned by pl190_read().
Each s->prio_mask entry contains the interrupt mask for all *higher*
priority interrupts, see pl190_update_vectors(). This means that
s->prio_mask[0] is always zero (as zero is the highest priority),
s->priority can never be zero as ((s->level | s->soft_level) &
s->prio_mask[0]) is always zero.
Therefore after the for loop in pl190_read() i is the index of the
current highest priority interrupt + 1.
Brendan.
>
> -- PMM
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pl190: fix read of VECTADDR
2012-08-18 10:41 ` Brendan Fennell
@ 2012-08-18 12:20 ` Peter Maydell
2012-08-18 20:00 ` Brendan Fennell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2012-08-18 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brendan Fennell; +Cc: qemu-devel
On 18 August 2012 11:41, Brendan Fennell <bfennell@skynet.ie> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2012, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
>> On 18 August 2012 03:55, Brendan Fennell <bfennell@skynet.ie> wrote:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Brendan Fennell <bfennell@skynet.ie>
>>> ---
>>> hw/pl190.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/pl190.c b/hw/pl190.c
>>> index cb50afb..d69d5be 100644
>>> --- a/hw/pl190.c
>>> +++ b/hw/pl190.c
>>> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static uint64_t pl190_read(void *opaque,
>>> target_phys_addr_t offset,
>>> s->priority = i;
>>> pl190_update(s);
>>> }
>>> - return s->vect_addr[s->priority];
>>> + return s->vect_addr[s->priority - 1];
>>> case 13: /* DEFVECTADDR */
>>> return s->vect_addr[16];
>>> default:
>>
>>
>> This doesn't look right -- if s->priority is zero then we'll read off
>> the beginning of the array.
>> What's the actual bug you're trying to fix here?
>
>
> The bug is that when, for example, interrupt 4 triggers the VECTADDR of
> interrupt 5 is returned by pl190_read().
>
> Each s->prio_mask entry contains the interrupt mask for all *higher*
> priority interrupts, see pl190_update_vectors(). This means that
> s->prio_mask[0] is always zero (as zero is the highest priority),
> s->priority can never be zero as ((s->level | s->soft_level) &
> s->prio_mask[0]) is always zero.
>
> Therefore after the for loop in pl190_read() i is the index of the
> current highest priority interrupt + 1.
Yes, looking more closely, you're right (though that's not obvious
at all...)
But we set s->priority to i, which seems wrong -- s->priority should
be the priority of the current active interrupt, and that's how we
treat it in pl190_update() [we assert s->irq if there's a pending
interrupt that's higher priority than the one we're currently servicing.]
So I think the fix ought to be to change the s->prio_mask[i] in the
loop to be s->prio_mask[i+1] instead. Then we'll exit the loop with
i as the current highest priority interrupt, which is what the following
code expects.
Some sort of explanatory comment in the loop might also assist
future readers :-)
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pl190: fix read of VECTADDR
2012-08-18 12:20 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2012-08-18 20:00 ` Brendan Fennell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Fennell @ 2012-08-18 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: qemu-devel
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 18 August 2012 11:41, Brendan Fennell <bfennell@skynet.ie> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 18 Aug 2012, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>>> On 18 August 2012 03:55, Brendan Fennell <bfennell@skynet.ie> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Brendan Fennell <bfennell@skynet.ie>
>>>> ---
>>>> hw/pl190.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/pl190.c b/hw/pl190.c
>>>> index cb50afb..d69d5be 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/pl190.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/pl190.c
>>>> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static uint64_t pl190_read(void *opaque,
>>>> target_phys_addr_t offset,
>>>> s->priority = i;
>>>> pl190_update(s);
>>>> }
>>>> - return s->vect_addr[s->priority];
>>>> + return s->vect_addr[s->priority - 1];
>>>> case 13: /* DEFVECTADDR */
>>>> return s->vect_addr[16];
>>>> default:
>>>
>>>
>>> This doesn't look right -- if s->priority is zero then we'll read off
>>> the beginning of the array.
>>> What's the actual bug you're trying to fix here?
>>
>>
>> The bug is that when, for example, interrupt 4 triggers the VECTADDR of
>> interrupt 5 is returned by pl190_read().
>>
>> Each s->prio_mask entry contains the interrupt mask for all *higher*
>> priority interrupts, see pl190_update_vectors(). This means that
>> s->prio_mask[0] is always zero (as zero is the highest priority),
>> s->priority can never be zero as ((s->level | s->soft_level) &
>> s->prio_mask[0]) is always zero.
>>
>> Therefore after the for loop in pl190_read() i is the index of the
>> current highest priority interrupt + 1.
>
> Yes, looking more closely, you're right (though that's not obvious
> at all...)
>
> But we set s->priority to i, which seems wrong -- s->priority should
> be the priority of the current active interrupt, and that's how we
> treat it in pl190_update() [we assert s->irq if there's a pending
> interrupt that's higher priority than the one we're currently servicing.]
>
> So I think the fix ought to be to change the s->prio_mask[i] in the
> loop to be s->prio_mask[i+1] instead. Then we'll exit the loop with
> i as the current highest priority interrupt, which is what the following
> code expects.
>
> Some sort of explanatory comment in the loop might also assist
> future readers :-)
I agree, that's a better solution - I'll follow up with a new patch.
Brendan.
>
> -- PMM
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-18 20:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-18 2:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pl190: fix read of VECTADDR Brendan Fennell
2012-08-18 10:00 ` Peter Maydell
2012-08-18 10:41 ` Brendan Fennell
2012-08-18 12:20 ` Peter Maydell
2012-08-18 20:00 ` Brendan Fennell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).