From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C24C54FD0 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BD632076C for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="DcdbedIH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9BD632076C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57694 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQsQP-0001m2-Ng for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 08:54:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQsPf-00015p-27 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 08:54:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQsPb-0001Vw-2c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 08:54:06 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::242]:41946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQsPa-0001RU-Hh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 08:54:02 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-x242.google.com with SMTP id 19so430422oiy.8 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 05:54:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IgsfLu8fDKex52tmXBw1daG8MMez6w409cisdImQGE8=; b=DcdbedIHgKM86dQEhfewKkda0z9fm2elEr4xmnEJ+nh7njpUwVbF6jn/242+knSab/ AMFoGs2jqRtzZQG+oe7pz0NTskBGgvrBtdHiVS5CN7j+rYda1uqF5nbqNS1z+eMlKgWg gw9lOfreQUOTZWfe0+OkqNEqQ9DR/pLkY11qCZBBggX2GBLswVtQSB2IjwoAPYXcCaDG 8cg6oepbE7uyKJqxCkvmk/I3m1+3/XJVer8LuYX3SxRj3DX+0XGW8EhhLICCUXrykhBV T36Qs+HBYqv6A3/CYPeZIvkVtPp3S1GvxombtRW3Ao/1N2QAKquy1AvTCZR72txs7qZ9 flhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IgsfLu8fDKex52tmXBw1daG8MMez6w409cisdImQGE8=; b=tn+7uA7Wq0nsjB1ieDDmX/O48aw9QarLLI5G1SHkNCMWSyhr1ehuHno0WCLhK1hHUw eEFiM33riDkx4lvwy2xTF2eFRruqiUNZWaR1nUJAnMaqJxC5hNMv8bjN0Ls3oJ+5tIN6 dPF+ud1QQPxZeZzTCvxjxSmSHBri7PA4vy89smPVGpQ121SpFORZl+i0GZZU6Hs/r/Jr R0ohobmKcwU6G170Jw8nzTWOgwLXGRdW0dLUCjJKOpHzu83zFARXcxi5MGDdyK7Mkm/Z j2gaPsfKopMhk4lbnOXZec19KXIY8SeK64AmMzOlyj2QFvFNKow/luXhwfT0zXt1xOIR aI4A== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaE5GrxWf6egZ/rxauRts039weUR3aBP6D7MynbNcaCgqBE7p2C Ad1W14/ER7qjX9zQPayYx+h3F65bJaD2KkGdhJJE5w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJvGaHnNkElBBzoPXMJSQ2VWx8PpBFUWKXnJiDf0Rvse4kjll1V6jtA6DoI1jpn6CH5Wk1xSTdVahDUOi5c0Nw= X-Received: by 2002:aca:dc56:: with SMTP id t83mr2845018oig.48.1587473641137; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 05:54:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200312193616.438922-1-crosa@redhat.com> <20200312221619.GA483011@dhcp-17-173.bos.redhat.com> <1367332727.1329619.1584360253413.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <849930679.1334346.1584361606961.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1182067639.1655516.1584421185287.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20200317141257.GA5724@localhost.localdomain> <87sgi49uf6.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> In-Reply-To: <87sgi49uf6.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:53:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] QEMU Gating CI To: Markus Armbruster Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::242; envelope-from=peter.maydell@linaro.org; helo=mail-oi1-x242.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: [-] PROGRAM ABORT : Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). Location : parse_addr6(), p0f-client.c:67 X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::242 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , Thomas Huth , Beraldo Leal , Erik Skultety , =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= , Wainer Moschetta , QEMU Developers , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Willian Rampazzo , Cleber Rosa , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= , Eduardo Habkost Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 16:33, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Peter Maydell writes: > > I think we should start by getting the gitlab setup working > > for the basic "x86 configs" first. Then we can try adding > > a runner for s390 (that one's logistically easiest because > > it is a project machine, not one owned by me personally or > > by Linaro) once the basic framework is working, and expand > > from there. > > Makes sense to me. > > Next steps to get this off the ground: > > * Red Hat provides runner(s) for x86 stuff we care about. > > * If that doesn't cover 'basic "x86 configs" in your judgement, we > fill the gaps as described below under "Expand from there". > > * Add an s390 runner using the project machine you mentioned. > > * Expand from there: identify the remaining gaps, map them to people / > organizations interested in them, and solicit contributions from these > guys. > > A note on contributions: we need both hardware and people. By people I > mean maintainers for the infrastructure, the tools and all the runners. > Cleber & team are willing to serve for the infrastructure, the tools and > the Red Hat runners. So, with 5.0 nearly out the door it seems like a good time to check in on this thread again to ask where we are progress-wise with this. My impression is that this patchset provides most of the scripting and config side of the first step, so what we need is for RH to provide an x86 runner machine and tell the gitlab CI it exists. I appreciate that the whole coronavirus and working-from-home situation will have upended everybody's plans, especially when actual hardware might be involved, but how's it going ? thanks -- PMM