From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAIwM-0005dc-Vy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:10:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAIwL-0001VC-IL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:10:34 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x342.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::342]:35013) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAIwK-0001RK-Ho for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:10:33 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-x342.google.com with SMTP id 14so2284845oth.2 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:10:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Peter Maydell Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 19:10:07 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/5] Misc RISC-V patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: Alistair Francis , Alistair Francis , Michael Clark , QEMU Developers On 10 October 2018 at 18:49, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > we should really > get the ball rolling on our big patch backlog. Yes, please do. Softfreeze is not all that far away and I would strongly prefer not to get an enormous sized pull request at the last minute. The ideal pattern is that code changes come in at a steady rate across the whole of the 'open' part of the development cycle. thanks -- PMM