From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: "Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: Trying to understand QOM object creation and property linking
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 15:04:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA_yg=FVCadEa7BBaudvyoZ+VgAppG5cT=T4MoKmYhGaQA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87iluxhrdc.fsf@linaro.org>
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 14:26, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 21:05, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> Can't be added as a subregion to the container...
> >>
> >> qemu-system-arm: ../../softmmu/memory.c:2538: memory_region_add_subregion_common: Assertion `!subregion->container' failed.
> >
> > This assert means you tried to add the same MemoryRegion
> > as a subregion of more than one parent MR.
>
> Right - that is probably something we should make (more?) explicitly
> clear in the Memory API docs.
The doc comment does document the requirement:
* [...] A region
* may only be added once as a subregion (unless removed with
* memory_region_del_subregion()); use memory_region_init_alias() if you
* want a region to be a subregion in multiple locations.
One of the deficiencies of C assert() is the lack of an
explanatory text message to go along with the raw expression.
> > You can either:
> > * pass all the CPUs the same container as their "memory" link,
> > if they all see the same view of the world
>
> This should be the case - I don't think the different cores have any
> particular different view of the world. The use of the two 4kb banks I
> think is purely convention.
>
> However trying for a single container shared between both cores fails
> because armv7m_realize adds it's board_memory to another container:
>
> memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(&s->container, 0, s->board_memory, -1);
Yeah, that trick only works for the real CPU object, not for
passing to SoC or SoC-like objects.
> So I guess I just have to repeat the creation of the aliases for each
> core. This seems needlessly messy...
It's not great, but the MR tree does need each MR to have only
one parent. Maybe there's some way to make it a bit less tedious
to create the aliases.
-- PMM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-06 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-05 18:03 Trying to understand QOM object creation and property linking Alex Bennée
2022-01-05 19:03 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2022-01-05 21:02 ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-06 11:16 ` Peter Maydell
2022-01-06 14:20 ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-06 15:04 ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2022-01-06 15:44 ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-06 15:52 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFEAcA_yg=FVCadEa7BBaudvyoZ+VgAppG5cT=T4MoKmYhGaQA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).