From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46579)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex.barcelo@gmail.com>) id 1RxeTp-0005te-IB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:01:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex.barcelo@gmail.com>) id 1RxeTf-0004Xh-2O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:01:05 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: alex.barcelo@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <7B11164E-5A9B-4053-97A1-904E9A776F86@suse.de>
References: <CAFKAgTcgMqVpopxTw8+8N005OSOoNM33L2a8DLJvn7Tpa-BGvQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFKAgTfOTniTEteFa5Rkms6PYXxDBFOS7g1VQNU4szXmC6T5Pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFKAgTeS9T=eTo2PQqc5DYwfZq_+8Dj0vCa9zB1X9dVWHziypQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<7B11164E-5A9B-4053-97A1-904E9A776F86@suse.de>
From: Alex Barcelo <abarcelo@ac.upc.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:00:30 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFKAgTd=1sm6e1v--OtVu2+_be87CFrJaQ8MVL5ci4Y0V8awkw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [TRIVIAL v2] Bad zero comparison for sas_ss_flags
	on powerpc
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 09:35, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
> On 15.02.2012, at 07:55, Alex Barcelo wrote:
>> ping? is this ok? Or it is not trivial at all, and better do a normal patch? And write it better?
>
> The patch is fine, but it's not trivial. It's a ppc patch, hence it should've gotten CC'ed
> to qemu-ppc :). Also, whatever mailer you used to send the patch line wrapped it:
> ...
>
> I'll fix it up and apply it to ppc-next.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks a lot!