Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] signal: Preparing safe sigprocmask wrapper on qemu-user

[Alex Barcelo <abarcelo@ac.upc.edu>]

okay, now I see that this lacks a lot of "presentation".

This is a patch to fix a problem on signal masks, and solves a certain
problem when the client is "playing the game" of sigsegv mask/unmask.
I will explain it a little more on a better patch. This should have
been explained on the 00/00 cover. And, moreover, this is kinda the v2
of a single-mail patch.

Before sending a v2, is there something more that I should correct?
And one netiquete question, test-breaking code should be in the
description (cover, 00/00)? On a next post in the same thread? Another
thread?

On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Alex Barcelo <abarcelo@ac.upc.edu> wrote:
> The first patch creates a sigprocmask wrapper on signal.c for its use in syscall.c
>
> The second patch changes the wrapper to protect sigsegv bit on the signal mask.
>
> Alex Barcelo (2):
>   signal: added a wrapper for sigprocmask function
>   signal: sigsegv protection on do_sigprocmask
>
>  linux-user/qemu.h    |    1 +
>  linux-user/signal.c  |   15 +++++++++++++++
>  linux-user/syscall.c |   20 ++++++++++----------
>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>