From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52094) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZScr-0006U0-H9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 17:07:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZScq-0004mN-L4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 17:07:13 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]:59848) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZScq-0004mH-GA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 17:07:12 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x12so4745725ief.12 for ; Mon, 06 May 2013 14:07:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5188157F.1080302@redhat.com> References: <87wqrci2zs.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <87r4hj4zqg.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <5188157F.1080302@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 14:07:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jordan Justen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Last Call for 1.5 before Hard Freeze List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel , Gleb Natapov On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 06/05/2013 22:31, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: >> Jordan Justen writes: >> >>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> I believe I have processed all of the outstanding pull requests and >>>> patches tagged for 1.5. If there are any other patches or pull requests >>>> you would like to be considered, please respond to this note with a >>>> pointer to the patch or make sure you send it out tagged with 'for-1.5' >>>> no later than 5pm US/Eastern. >>> >>> Is there a chance of including the KVM PC flash series in 1.5? >>> Unfortunately, I'm assuming no given the timing. >> >> I think we're going to need to delay it. Did we ever come to a >> consensus about what to do on older kernels? > > Yes, the patches only use the new feature is -pflash is given on the > command line. memory_region_set_readonly is only used in a few places, > so I think this series could go in; it is a fix for a TCG-mode regression. > > I'm curious however if it causes -M isapc to regress, because in 1.4 it > works only in KVM mode, not in TCG mode. It looks like isapc has always set rom_only to 1, meaning it never should have supported PC flash. So, I hope isapc didn't ever have any noticeable behavior change due to the PC flash feature. -Jordan