From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E98EC433F5 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23B2961A50 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:30:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 23B2961A50 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:58508 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mW3dS-00045r-Ih for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:30:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mW3bq-00038Z-GQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:28:54 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:38544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mW3bn-0000RU-3e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:28:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1633037330; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=lHbfh/0AXnTddBTpdFrkeI/molwS4patstCwEC9O2mY=; b=WmwYbdQXBYe43oxTn8/X17dWLncTmqRHmkB3iHcpkSbHykpZpIBc5NyDny+1YFpB+SU+tR Kkxkg1LmVIC/YrTZ1mnufTNt16tXwzvbcGPtEQilWg/S25EFurk1lKfo03CUocb98pgcC3 /mPO1Ku9LhuIEGB9tTlwbv6MAXahk9Q= Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com [209.85.222.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-466-lX_WRNN1PTePj_thhhU59A-1; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:28:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: lX_WRNN1PTePj_thhhU59A-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id k22-20020ab07016000000b002c963250ef9so3692445ual.9 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:28:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lHbfh/0AXnTddBTpdFrkeI/molwS4patstCwEC9O2mY=; b=ozw2PcxAkxkJ1i2FlDgHoIrsMfkoYn1mBgb9/l7w2m/tXoAeZ2MC9SkJD90Xk1Pjo0 OX00f6JpY2IOu9ozcMXwzIDhzUfZF2HlnLymbDx559UcvhYOC1Ziqqb+hzd6tsIeH00h 3r+WliOqxfdJTzjTv65qzHl/uKPbDRckG8dIO8wEl6CbP6L9wEc86PiAGqsID5xXDfpR SwmIDwrTAhEuD+s+CICGsM5qBLelvsTwdHyWI8qYuTN6tT2mxSX88oAZNlrLFiW4BaE2 0/rHfIyab/G5E5sbSvSZx7oMAOy3EC12KYUGvY3jgD8SikOO+8WGk3fWpLqgTxaYQvhd dY+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/V69TI2Wea9qu3wvoF99DpICLdgyXVf7oiS/g471yIuOnY3v3 8f3EbBSO64IHCBTvKL1BSAzW9/bnlXVQvdEUDVE4phHDFrxQiUlnPaOTvMI4qhRsnueBqDcVs3z fGZ+2F1QCzSWWRzedPSN48exIunpa4Dc= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:3c89:: with SMTP id a9mr8449632uax.32.1633037326399; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:28:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzytxuX3G0eFzrJJ7yCTQu2V47qwyt+COTsaG3lTbKONX+M414j8WejZu8GS4NpvIZw8Dzxo0uBz8vTCf3iR3U= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:3c89:: with SMTP id a9mr8449600uax.32.1633037325808; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:28:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: John Snow Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:28:35 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Running 297 from GitLab CI To: Kevin Wolf Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=jsnow@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b5c70305cd3d216a" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=jsnow@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Hanna Reitz , qemu-devel , qemu-block@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" --000000000000b5c70305cd3d216a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hiya, I was talking this over with Hanna in review to '[PATCH v3 00/16] python/iotests: Run iotest linters during Python CI' [1] and I have some doubt about what you'd personally like to see happen, here. In a nutshell, I split out 'linters.py' from 297 and keep all of the iotest-bits in 297 and all of the generic "run the linters" bits in linters.py, then I run linters.py from the GitLab python CI jobs. I did this so that iotest #297 would continue to work exactly as it had, but trying to serve "two masters" in the form of two test suites means some non-beautiful design decisions. Hanna suggested we just outright drop test 297 to possibly improve the factoring of the tests. I don't want to do that unless you give it the go-ahead, though. I wanted to hear your feelings on if we still want to keep 297 around or not. --js [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-09/msg05787.html --000000000000b5c70305cd3d216a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hiya, I was talking this over with Hanna in review to= '[PATCH v3 00/16] python/iotests: Run iotest linters during Python CI&= #39; [1] and I have some doubt about what you'd personally like to see = happen, here.

In a nutshell, I split out 'lint= ers.py' from 297 and keep all of the iotest-bits in 297 and all of the = generic "run the linters" bits in linters.py, then I run linters.= py from the GitLab python CI jobs.

I did this so t= hat iotest #297 would continue to work exactly as it had, but trying to ser= ve "two masters" in the form of two test suites means some non-be= autiful design decisions. Hanna suggested we just outright drop test 297 to= possibly improve the factoring of the tests.

= I don't want to do that unless you give it the go-ahead, though. I want= ed to hear your feelings on if we still want to keep 297 around or not.
=

--js

--000000000000b5c70305cd3d216a--