From: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.s.norwitz@gmail.com>
To: Dima Stepanov <dimastep@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
jasowang@redhat.com,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
QEMU <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Raphael Norwitz" <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>,
fengli@smartx.com, yc-core@yandex-team.ru,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
"Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost-user-blk: delay vhost_user_blk_disconnect
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 20:55:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFubqFvOU-ZFnhmCUNGH9gyuwa4us0UNPvZ6QTggDLwUr7y=RA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69b73b94dcd066065595266c852810e0863a0895.1590396396.git.dimastep@yandex-team.ru>
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 5:13 AM Dima Stepanov <dimastep@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>
> A socket write during vhost-user communication may trigger a disconnect
> event, calling vhost_user_blk_disconnect() and clearing all the
> vhost_dev structures holding data that vhost-user functions expect to
> remain valid to roll back initialization correctly. Delay the cleanup to
> keep vhost_dev structure valid.
> There are two possible states to handle:
> 1. RUN_STATE_PRELAUNCH: skip bh oneshot call and perform disconnect in
> the caller routine.
> 2. RUN_STATE_RUNNING: delay by using bh
>
> BH changes are based on the similar changes for the vhost-user-net
> device:
> commit e7c83a885f865128ae3cf1946f8cb538b63cbfba
> "vhost-user: delay vhost_user_stop"
>
> Signed-off-by: Dima Stepanov <dimastep@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Li Feng - would you also like to sign off here?
> ---
> hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c b/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c
> index 9d8c0b3..76838e7 100644
> --- a/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c
> +++ b/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c
> @@ -349,6 +349,19 @@ static void vhost_user_blk_disconnect(DeviceState *dev)
> vhost_dev_cleanup(&s->dev);
> }
>
> +static void vhost_user_blk_event(void *opaque, QEMUChrEvent event);
> +
> +static void vhost_user_blk_chr_closed_bh(void *opaque)
> +{
> + DeviceState *dev = opaque;
> + VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(dev);
> + VHostUserBlk *s = VHOST_USER_BLK(vdev);
> +
> + vhost_user_blk_disconnect(dev);
> + qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chardev, NULL, NULL, vhost_user_blk_event,
> + NULL, opaque, NULL, true);
> +}
> +
> static void vhost_user_blk_event(void *opaque, QEMUChrEvent event)
> {
> DeviceState *dev = opaque;
> @@ -363,7 +376,30 @@ static void vhost_user_blk_event(void *opaque, QEMUChrEvent event)
> }
> break;
> case CHR_EVENT_CLOSED:
> - vhost_user_blk_disconnect(dev);
> + /*
> + * A close event may happen during a read/write, but vhost
> + * code assumes the vhost_dev remains setup, so delay the
> + * stop & clear. There are two possible paths to hit this
> + * disconnect event:
> + * 1. When VM is in the RUN_STATE_PRELAUNCH state. The
> + * vhost_user_blk_device_realize() is a caller.
> + * 2. In tha main loop phase after VM start.
> + *
> + * For p2 the disconnect event will be delayed. We can't
> + * do the same for p1, because we are not running the loop
> + * at this moment. So just skip this step and perform
> + * disconnect in the caller function.
> + *
> + * TODO: maybe it is a good idea to make the same fix
> + * for other vhost-user devices.
> + */
> + if (runstate_is_running()) {
> + AioContext *ctx = qemu_get_current_aio_context();
> +
> + qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chardev, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> + NULL, NULL, false);
> + aio_bh_schedule_oneshot(ctx, vhost_user_blk_chr_closed_bh, opaque);
> + }
> break;
> case CHR_EVENT_BREAK:
> case CHR_EVENT_MUX_IN:
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-31 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-28 9:11 [PATCH v4 0/2] vhost-user reconnect issues during vhost initialization Dima Stepanov
2020-05-28 9:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] char-socket: return -1 in case of disconnect during tcp_chr_write Dima Stepanov
2020-05-28 9:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost-user-blk: delay vhost_user_blk_disconnect Dima Stepanov
2020-05-31 0:55 ` Raphael Norwitz [this message]
2020-06-02 3:16 ` Li Feng
2020-06-02 8:31 ` Dima Stepanov
2020-09-14 13:40 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] vhost-user reconnect issues during vhost initialization Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFubqFvOU-ZFnhmCUNGH9gyuwa4us0UNPvZ6QTggDLwUr7y=RA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=raphael.s.norwitz@gmail.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=dimastep@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=fengli@smartx.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com \
--cc=yc-core@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).