From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34358)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jidong.xiao@gmail.com>) id 1X1Ygk-0006c4-1C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 06:19:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jidong.xiao@gmail.com>) id 1X1Ygj-00053d-7z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 06:19:53 -0400
Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]:56583)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jidong.xiao@gmail.com>) id 1X1Ygj-00052m-2h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 06:19:53 -0400
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id wp4so8326457obc.26
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 03:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1404122529.28960.24.camel@localhost>
References: <201406300939223611342@sangfor.com>
	<1404122529.28960.24.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 06:19:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4AFWYvVHLv0zuaPFsFPOAdExu57YLwT51ZqOUh0oCg=u=Vwg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jidong Xiao <jidong.xiao@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [questions] about KVM as a Microsoft-compatible
	hypervisor
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com>
Cc: Zhang Haoyu <zhanghy@sangfor.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 09:39 +0800, Zhang Haoyu wrote:
>> Hi, Vadim
>> I read the kvm-2012-forum paper < KVM as a Microsoft-compatible hypervisor>,
>> Any update and other references, please?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Zhang Haoyu
>>
>>
>
> Unfortunately, not too much.
> From the the most recent, we have lazy eoi implemented by
> MST and reference time counter.
>
> Best regards,
> Vadim.
>
It looks like that Mircosoft has defined a large number of synthetic
registers in their Hyper-v spec, so ultimately KVM should virtualize
most of these registers, so as to support the Mircosoft Enlightment,
right?

-Jidong