From: Andrew Keesler <ankeesler@google.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Roque Arcudia Hernandez <roqueh@google.com>,
mst@redhat.com, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, venture@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hw/display: Allow injection of virtio-gpu EDID name
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:07:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGZECHMEYjL56AZebqOK4dTgQbLtwA=9=yZ0qi0ymSpMS2x7Gw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z0XxYpvj49colIIy@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2208 bytes --]
Thanks, Daniel. We'll get this patch updated and send it out again.
> it makes sense to allow for a data structure
Whoops, I misread your original message - data structure SGTM.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 11:04 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 03:54:40PM -0500, Andrew Keesler wrote:
> > I follow what you are saying. I misunderstood what a "display" was in the
> > domain of QEMU. Yes, this makes more sense now.
> >
> > > the user should give names for every output at startup
> >
> > I see DEFINE_PROP_ARRAY exists. I can use that to define the new
> "outputs"
> > property. Any reason that each "output" would ever need to be an object
> > (rather than just a string)? Nothing comes to mind, I'm just taking a
> second
> > to think about API forwards compatibility.
>
> Currently we have 'xres' and 'yres' properties set against the device
> for virtio-gpu.
>
> If we're going to extend it to allow the name of each "output" head
> to be configured, it makes sense to allow for a data structure that
> will let us also cnofigure xres & yres per output.
>
> Hence, I thought it would make more sense to have an array of structs,
> rather than the simpler array of strings, which will let us set any
> amount of per-output config data we might want in future.
>
> NB, I'm not asking you to wire up support for xres/yres per output,
> just that we anticipate it as a possibility.
>
> > > upto whatever they said for "max_outputs"
> >
> > Where is the best place to perform this validation? I would imagine we
> would
> > want to fast-fail if the user provided more "outputs" than
> "max_outputs". I
> > can
> > perform the validation in virtio_gpu_base_get_features but that seems
> late.
>
> I'd suggest putting it in virtio_gpu_base_device_realize, as we already
> have code there to validate 'max_outputs" is within limits.
>
>
> With regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com -o-
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org -o-
> https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org -o-
> https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3276 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-26 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 21:53 [PATCH 0/2] Allow injection of virtio-gpu EDID name Roque Arcudia Hernandez
2024-10-17 21:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] ui: Allow injection of vnc display name Roque Arcudia Hernandez
2024-10-21 11:14 ` Marc-André Lureau
2024-10-21 20:03 ` Andrew Keesler
2024-10-22 7:49 ` Marc-André Lureau
2024-10-22 7:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-22 7:53 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-22 8:04 ` Marc-André Lureau
2024-10-22 8:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-22 8:36 ` Marc-André Lureau
2024-10-28 19:25 ` Andrew Keesler
2024-11-22 14:40 ` Andrew Keesler
2024-10-22 7:14 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-17 21:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw/display: Allow injection of virtio-gpu EDID name Roque Arcudia Hernandez
2024-11-25 12:04 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-11-25 20:54 ` Andrew Keesler
2024-11-26 16:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-11-26 21:07 ` Andrew Keesler [this message]
2024-12-02 20:31 ` Andrew Keesler
2024-12-05 16:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-12-10 9:27 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGZECHMEYjL56AZebqOK4dTgQbLtwA=9=yZ0qi0ymSpMS2x7Gw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ankeesler@google.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=roqueh@google.com \
--cc=venture@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).